JWST Launches Tomorrow! (Screams Internally)

Disclosure: I am a NASA postdoc. However, all opinions are my own.

Hi, everyone. Just a PSA that the James Webb Space Telescope lifts off tomorrow morning from French Guiana. (Yes, on Christmas Day.) The launch is at 7:20 AM Eastern time (12:20 UTC), and live coverage will begin on NASA TV at 6 AM.

This is NASA’s newest giant space mission, which has been built as a successor to Hubble (even though Hubble is still kicking). JWST will look back closer to the Big Bang, get a better look at planets than ever before, and a bunch of other cool science, too.

And we really, really need this to go off without a hitch.

I’ll just refer you to this Slate article for why astronomers like me are totally freaking out about this. Seriously, this thing is 14 years behind schedule and costs 10 times the original budget estimate. It feels like it’s already set astronomy back 10 years by getting so bogged down. Now, that’s probably uncharitable; a lot of the problems stemmed from getting a totally unrealistic sales pitch when it was first proposed. But still, there are a lot of things that can go wrong and very few options to fix them if they do. Maybe Elon Musk could get someone out there within 5 years to service it, but it’s not really designed to be serviced to start with. This needs to work on the first try.

And yes, the designers and engineers have done great work, and they’ve tested and retested everything (I think something like a year of the delays were for testing reasons), and I have the utmost respect for them…but there are still tens of thousands of person-years of future work that are riding on a mission that is three times as complicated as the Mars Perseverance rover at the start of the year.

So, yeah, I think the astronomy community has good reason to be nervous. If you’re a praying person, this one is (sort of) traditional:

“Dear Lord, please don’t let us %$*& up!” —Pseudo-Alan Shepard

Posted in Current events, Space, Space exploration | Tagged , | Comments Off on JWST Launches Tomorrow! (Screams Internally)

Movie Review: Spider-Man: No Way Home

Well, it’s about time I got back to these. For those of you who started reading my blog after I started my podcast, I used to do movie reviews pretty often here. It’s just that I’ve hardly seen any new movies since the pandemic started. Even with the new Marvel movies (ones where I wasn’t familiar with the characters), I couldn’t seem to find the time or effort.

But I certainly wasn’t going to pass up Spider-Man: No Way Home. The third installment of the MCU’s version of Spider-Man came out this weekend, and it is getting big reviews—so far even better than Homecoming and Far From Home.

And…yeah, it’s pretty high up there. I think…I would put Far From Home first, No Way Home second and Homecoming third, but ask me again tomorrow, and I might have a completely different answer. It’s really too close to call. And that’s impressive, because how many other trilogies are out there where all three movies are truly top tier? There’s Lord of the Rings and Toy Story, and…I think that might be it.

And now, the MCU Spider-Man.

My rating: 5 out of 5.

Continue reading
Posted in Movie Reviews | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Movie Review: Spider-Man: No Way Home

Writer’s History #6 – David Brin

S3E5: Modern Sci-Fi Television A Reader's History of Science Fiction

In this episode, I review the recent history and current status of science fiction on television during the streaming era. TV recommendation: The Orville
  1. S3E5: Modern Sci-Fi Television
  2. S3E4: Larry Niven Interview
  3. S3E3: Cameron Kunzelman Discusses Sci-Fi Video Games
  4. S3E2: Robert Silverberg Interview
  5. S3E1: Jim Harris Discusses the Classics of Sci-Fi

In this episode, I interview David Brin, author of the Uplift Series, The Postman, Existence, and many more.

David Brin’s website.
Advice for new writers.
Sample chapters of many of Brin’s books.
Brin’s recommended reading list.
Brin on Robert Heinlein.
Recommended essay: “The World, the Flesh, and the Devil” by J. D. Bernal.

Check out this episode!

Posted in A Reader's History of Science Fiction, Interviews | Comments Off on Writer’s History #6 – David Brin

An Obstinacy of Buffalo Buffalo

Some Linguistic Ramblings

If you study linguistics on a casual level, you may have previously encountered this sentence:

“Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo.”

American bison k5680-1.jpg
Buffalo.

This is, in fact, a fully grammatical English sentence—and without any punctuation, at that. (Although the capitalization is mandatory.) It even has its own Wikipedia article. This may sound ridiculous, but it works based on the multiple meanings of the word “buffalo.” “Buffalo” usually refers to the animal[1], but it can also mean the city in upstate New York. Thus, a “Buffalo buffalo” is a buffalo from Buffalo, New York. Meanwhile, “buffalo” can also be used as a verb. Depending on the context, it can mean “to bully” (which makes sense; it’s based on a similar animal), and it can also mean “to baffle” (which also kind of makes sense based on similar sounds).

Continue reading
Posted in language | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

#39 – Postcyberpunk and Transhumanism

After cyberpunk had its day, a more mature, less countercultural successor to it emerged, known as postcyberpunk. In this episode, we explore what makes it distinctive and how it ties in with the ideas of transhumanism.

Book recommendation: Existence by David Brin.

Other books discussed:
Permutation City by Greg Egan
The Imperial Radch/Ancillary trilogy by Ann Leckie
Accelerando by Charles Stross (free download)
Blindsight by Peter Watts

Charles Stross’s “crib sheet” on Accelerando.

Check out this episode!

Posted in A Reader's History of Science Fiction | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on #39 – Postcyberpunk and Transhumanism

#38 – Cyberpunk Derivatives

Cyberpunk has produced many offshoots over the years as new authors have applied the style to other historical eras and new technologies. In this episode, we tour the wide spread of these diverse subgenres.

Book recommendations:
The Difference Engine by William Gibson and Bruce Sterling
The Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson

Other works mentioned: too many to name. Full list here.

Check out this episode!

Posted in A Reader's History of Science Fiction | Tagged , , | Comments Off on #38 – Cyberpunk Derivatives

Follow-Up: Works Mentioned in Episode #38

In this week’s episode of A Reader’s History of Science Fiction, I discussed all of the various cyberpunk derivatives that have cropped up over the years. And much like the previous one about time travel, I ran through far too many titles to fit in the episode description, so I’ve written out the full list below.

Steampunk

Morlock Night by K. W. Jeter
The Wild Wild West (TV show)
Wild Wild West (film)
The Time Machine (2002 film)
Around the World in 80 Days (2004 film)
Sherlock Holmes (2009 film)
Atlantis: The Lost Empire
The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen
Howl’s Moving Castle
The Difference Engine by William Gibson and Bruce Sterling (recommended)
The Thrilling Adventures of Lovelace and Babbage by Sydney Padua

Dieselpunk

Children of the Sun (RPG) by Lewis Pollak
Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow
Wolfenstein
The Man in the High Castle by Philip K. Dick
The Legend of Korra
Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand

Atompunk

James Bond
The Jetsons
The Iron Giant (film)
The Incredibles
Fallout

Steelpunk

Snowpiercer
The Terminator
Mad Max

Clockpunk

Mainspring by Jay Lake
The Three Musketeers (2011 film)

Swordpunk

Treasure Planet
The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Bronzepunk

Clash of the Titans
God of War

Stonepunk

10,000 BC
The Land that Time Forgot
The Clan of the Cave Bear

Nowpunk

The Zenith Angle by Bruce Sterling
Scott Pilgrim
Steven Universe
Rick and Morty

Biopunk

Gattaca
Splice
Repo Men
Resident Evil
BioShock
The Windup Girl by Paolo Bacigalupi
Twig (web serial) by John McCrae/Wildbow

Nanopunk

Prey by Michael Crichton
Deus Ex
Transcendence
The Diamond Age by Neal Stephenson (recommended)

Posted in A Reader's History of Science Fiction, Follow-Up | Tagged , | Comments Off on Follow-Up: Works Mentioned in Episode #38

#37 – Cyberpunk

Cyberpunk was the big new subgenre of sci-fi in the 80s–the combination of “lowlife and high-tech.” In this episode, we explore the highlights of this subgenre.

Book recommendation: Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson

Other works discussed:
Akira
Neuromancer
by William Gibson
The Matrix
Altered Carbon by Richard K. Morgan
Ready Player One by Ernest Cline

My review of Ready Player Two.

Check out this episode!

Posted in A Reader's History of Science Fiction | Tagged , , | Comments Off on #37 – Cyberpunk

#36 – Alternate History

Alternate histories, where events in the past unfolded differently, are a fairly new genre, but it’s made large strides since it first became popular in the 80s. In this episode, we look at an overview of these works.

Book recommendation: The Calculating Stars by Mary Robinette Kowal.
My companion blog post on The Calculating Stars.

Other books discussed:
The Domination by S. M. Stirling
“The Road Not Taken”, The Guns of the South and Harry Turtledove in general.
The Years of Rice and Salt by Kim Stanley Robinson
The Yiddish Policemen’s Union by Michael Chabon

Check out this episode!

Posted in A Reader's History of Science Fiction | Tagged , , | Comments Off on #36 – Alternate History

How Bad Would the Greenhouse Effect in The Calculating Stars Really Be?

In Mary Robinette Kowal’s The Calculating Stars, a meteor hits the east coast of the United States in the 1950s, obliterating Washington DC and causing global climate catastrophe. Mathematical genius and future Lady Astronaut Elma York calculates that the climate shock will within a couple of generations tip the Earth into a runaway greenhouse state like Venus, destroying all life on the planet. (And note that it is specifically a runaway greenhouse. She explicitly mentions the oceans boiling.)

Later, the scientists back away from this claim and say that with careful control of carbon emissions, this fate may be avoidable, but they won’t know for sure until it’s too late.

Does this make sense? Well…no. While the vast majority of the book is very well researched (as far as I can determine), this part is not good science. To cut a long story short, there’s basically no way for a runaway greenhouse effect to happen on Earth. But this doesn’t necessarily negate the rest of the story. I wanted to investigate how bad this disaster would really be.

Continue reading
Posted in Follow-Up, Science, Science Fiction, Story Analysis | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments